To what
extent is the titular story of ‘The Bloody Chamber’ shocking?
The
short story, “The Bloody Chamber”, sees the exploration of many Gothic
elements. However, one of the most resonant ones throughout the story is that
of ‘shock’. There are many instances in the story that support the statement.
The
marriage between a young, virginal girl, to a recently widowed old rich man
comes as a shocking surprise. More interesting is the fact that they share
almost no common interest – whilst the girl loves music and takes to playing at
the piano whenever time permits, the Marquis amuses himself by collecting
paintings and novels that deal with ritualistic eroticism. The Marquis catches
his new wife peering into The Immolation of the wives of the Sultan, and we see
him patronise her by saying, “My little nun has found the prayerbooks, has
she?” The young girl’s ‘painful, furious bewilderment’ can be supported by
Bertens’ commentary on gender stereotypes: she resembles the woman who is
“cute, but essentially helpless” under the dominating nature of the ancestrally
rich Marquis that she has married. The shock that reader receives to see the
husband refer to his wife as “baby” or “little one” frequently differentiates
the fine line between the “monster” and the humane part of the Marquis.
Secondly,
the treatment of females is widely covered in “The Bloody Chamber”, and most of
the time, the reader is appalled by the way in which Carter goes about the
description of these scenes in the story. When the Marquis strips the young
girl for the first time, we see the narrator’s ambivalent reaction to the
consummation of her marriage. “Enough! No; more!” The constant references to
fairytales throughout the story remind us of the helpless heroine who must
succumb to the sexual wants of the man to survive in the end. The language makes many subtle references to religious
and cultural beliefs (Adam and Eve, aristocratic behaviour in the eighteenth
century) and the 'representations of characters' that Botting refers to make
the reader wonder if it is morally right for a recently-turned widower to
remarry a girl almost half his age simply because she has a "potential for
corruption". Perhaps what shocks
the reader more is Carter’s bold portrayal of ‘pornographic confrontation’ in
1979 when feminism was only just being accepted; the embodiment of woman as an
independent being is a theme that not only shocks but goes beyond shock in that
it educates the society and those that read the story.
Most
importantly, the chamber and its contents itself are one of the most shocking
elements throughout “The Bloody Chamber” – the blood, corpses and immolation
that Carter depicts not only induces fear in the reader, but more so blurs the
boundaries between the Marquis’ constant psychological trauma between pain and
pleasure. Whilst sadism (depicted in the Marquis) and the blurring of
boundaries shocks the reader into believing the Marquis really is the
“atrocious monster”, Carter succeeds at repulsing yet at the very same time
attracting the reader to the story.
Nevertheless,
some readers would go as far to say that, given “The Bloody Chamber” is based
on the fairytale “Bluebeard”, it is too predictable to be shocking. The twists
and turns are not that surprising, as they are likely to be expected to one who
is contextually familiar with fairytales. Carter replaces the conventional male
hero with the heroine’s mother, who herself is the embodiment of masculine
femininity and whose “maternal telepathy” avers the tragedy. In addition to
this, many feminists would argue that the purpose of “The Bloody Chamber” is
not to shock, but rather to educate; educate both women and the rest of society
about the dangers of the world, and what the result of naivety and desire for
material wealth leads to.